![Soundop audio editor tm](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/7_64e61dfbddf2b36517292648.png)
![soundop audio editor tm soundop audio editor tm](https://cdn.akamai.steamstatic.com/steam/apps/580310/ss_13046a5c5c2622df369ae2fe7ccc349fe59739dc.1920x1080.jpg)
![soundop audio editor tm soundop audio editor tm](https://cdn.afterdawn.fi/screenshots/normal/17947.jpg)
Even in difficult situations and without a mixer, I'm able to get stellar results. The Sound Devices 702 is actually the recorder that I use most often, combined with a Rode NTG-3. Video is no longer available: The results aren't very surprising if you've used any of these devices before, though the results of any of the recorders would certainly be improved by using a mixer with a good preamp in front of the recorder. He received so much feedback that he's added a number of devices to the test and is now comparing the signal-to-noise ratio performance of the preamps of a number of devices, the Sound Devices 702, Zoom H4n, Tascam DR-100 MKII, Tascam DR-680, Edirol R44, Beachtek DXA-SLR PRO, and juicedLink Riggy Micro/Assist. Last month a test was conducted by Robert Rozak, President of juicedLink, comparing the preamps from his company's products with a similar offering from Beachtek, with both going right into the Canon 7D.
![Soundop audio editor tm](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/7_64e61dfbddf2b36517292648.png)